Torture Claims in Tunisia Await Truth Commission
TUNIS
 — One of the most notorious forms of torture was the “roast chicken,” 
an obscene stress position in which the victim was suspended naked, like
 a trussed bird on a spit.
During
 months of interrogation that began when he was just 17, Mohamed Hamemi,
 now 45 and an athletics trainer, repeatedly endured the excruciating 
posture as the government cracked down on an Islamist movement in the 
1980s.
“There
 are stories I cannot even tell,” he said. “You spend the whole day 
naked, with feet cuffed, in the chicken position. When all your body 
goes blue, they drop you down, throw water on you, and then yank you up 
again.”
Mr.
 Hamemi is one of the thousands of Tunisians who have arrived at the 
country’s newly formed Truth and Dignity Commission, an ambitious effort
 to examine past abuses and answer demands for justice.
Every
 day, people like him come, middle-aged men and women with lined faces, 
sitting silently, waiting to submit their papers. Some describe being 
beaten unconscious, hung upside down, plunged underwater or into buckets
 of human waste, electrocuted, raped and sodomized, often while spouses 
and others were made to watch.
 
Before
 the revolutions that swept the region more than four years ago, that 
kind of torture, though especially cruel, was not uncommon in the Arab 
world. For decades, the region’s dictators made sure to crush any 
perceived threat to their rule.
What is exceptional about Tunisia,
 now a democracy, is that it is daring to examine its past abuses 
publicly. There is even talk of televising the public hearings that are 
scheduled to begin in June.
Such
 a public vetting of past sins has been attempted by other nations at 
turning points between dictatorship and democracy, like South Africa and
 El Salvador. Though the process can be painful, leaving it undone could
 allow old grievances to fester and eventually erupt again.
Though Tunisia’s
 effort is intended to unify and heal, it is not universally embraced 
here. The commission struggled with the bureaucracy over money and with 
the police over access to archives even before opening its doors to the 
public in December.
Doubts
 are mounting that the commission will achieve its high-minded goals. 
The country’s two main political parties seek reconciliation in the 
interest of national stability, but seem less interested in justice. And
 members of the old regime’s political and business elite have retained 
influence in the new democratic order.
“There is resistance from the administration, so we have many challenges,” said Sihem Bensedrine,
 the former journalist and human rights activist who leads the 
commission. “That is our job, to deconstruct the machine, understand how
 it works, and then rebuild and see what not to do.”
Over
 the next four to five years, the commission plans to reveal the full 
range of human rights violations committed during nearly 60 years of 
authoritarian rule in Tunisia, and to hold those who committed the most 
egregious crimes accountable.
Its time frame starts in 1955, a year before independence from France, and includes the long rule of two dictators, Presidents Habib Bourguiba and Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali.
 It encompasses a mass killing during the independence movement; the 
torture and imprisonment of an estimated 30,000 trade unionists, 
students, leftists and Islamists by the dictatorship; and the casualties
 of the 2011 revolution that began the Arab Spring: 338 dead and 2,147 
wounded.
“It
 is not about one regime or another,” said Emtyez Bellali, a project 
associate at the World Organization Against Torture’s chapter in Tunis, 
the capital. “Torture has been the way of governance in this country. We
 should fight it because it is in the mentality of everyone.”
While
 the nation’s authoritarian leaders were promoting Tunisia as a modern, 
secular country of universal education and emancipated women, they were 
also running a system of torture and repression, hidden from view, that 
broke families and silenced dissent.
The
 worst torture chambers were said to be those in the basement of the 
Interior Ministry, a gray concrete building at one end of a cafe-lined 
central boulevard. Nearby residents would hear the screams of prisoners 
at 3 a.m., according to Mounira Ben Kaddour, secretary general of the 
Tunisian Women’s Association, which has gathered testimony from more 
than 400 women since the revolution.
Outside
 prison, the repression continued. Former inmates were expelled from 
jobs and colleges, subjected to rigid police control and harassment, and
 forced to divorce or go into exile.
Though
 the abuses have been reported before, the scale of repression and the 
machinery of dictatorship are only now being fully exposed and 
understood.
Several
 victims interviewed recently sat on the ground to demonstrate the roast
 chicken, with one calling on his daughter to bring a scarf and 
broomstick.
 
Arms
 were handcuffed around bent legs, they said, and the body was hung from
 a metal bar passed under the knees and balanced on two tables. Then the
 flogging began.
Mr.
 Hamemi was tortured during government crackdowns on Islamists. He and 
two cellmates submitted their claims to the truth commission together 
and emerged afterward with their shoulders hunched against the sharp 
wind.
“They
 beat us with sticks and electric cables,” Mr. Hamemi said in an 
interview, at one point breaking into sobs. “They would even put sticks 
in our private parts. They tied our private organs and pulled them. I 
was also hung upside down on a door, hands tied, for five to six hours.”
Mohamed Salah Barhoumi, a taxi driver who went to prison twice, said he had received much the same treatment.
“I
 was harassed for 13 years by the administration, and my family was, 
too,” he said in an interview. “Three days in a row, they did the ‘roast
 chicken’ on me. From night to day, slaps, blows, all kinds of kicking.”
The
 torturers wanted information, and everyone gave up names and even 
confessed to crimes that they had not committed, Mr. Hamemi said. “If 
you refused to sign, they would take you back to the torture again,” he 
said.
Rached
 Jaidane, a math professor, was imprisoned for 13 years for plotting 
against the president, a charge he says was invented. He has since tried
 to sue officials from the former dictator, Mr. Ben Ali, on down, with 
little success.
“It
 is important to have public hearings, on television,” Mr. Jaidane said,
 so that generations to come will know what happened. “It may be 
difficult, but we must dare.”
Many
 victims who hoped for swift justice after the revolution are 
disillusioned by how slow the process has been. Advocates complain of a 
lack of political will, as well as inefficiencies and divisions within 
the truth commission. Ms. Bensedrine, the head of the commission, has 
been criticized for combative leadership by colleagues and by the news 
media, which is hostile to the idea of transitional justice.
She
 said in an interview that the new government had initially backed the 
commission’s work but had not followed through. Bureaucrats have delayed
 its funds, she said, and the police stopped her from removing 
government archives from the presidential palace, despite a promise of 
cooperation.
Ms.
 Bensedrine said she planned to build a database of thousands of cases. 
The most egregious cases will be referred to special chambers for 
prosecution. Because testifying can be as traumatic as the original 
torture, psychiatrists are counseling victims.
The
 commission has the power to subpoena witnesses and government archives 
and to reopen previously tried cases, although that is being challenged 
as unconstitutional. It is not bound by a statute of limitations.
Since President Beji Caid Essebsi
 and his party, Nidaa Tounes, won elections in the fall, though, the 
political ground in Tunisia has been shifting. Mr. Essebsi, who held 
senior positions under both dictatorships, said in an interview that he 
was preparing amendments to the law establishing the commission.
He
 has proposed amnesty for businessmen accused of corruption if they 
invest their money in Tunisia. The Islamist party, Ennahda, has signaled
 support, but others have criticized the idea.
The
 former cellmates are divided on what justice they prefer. Some want 
financial compensation for their families after years of forced penury. 
Mr. Barhoumi wants the restoration of his taxi license, which still 
eludes him after four years of red tape.
Mr.
 Hamemi said he wanted to hear his torturers apologize. “I could have 
done it with my own hands after the revolution,” he said, “but I want to
 do it by the law.”
         Correction: May 20, 2015  
Because of an editing error, an earlier version of this article misstated the start of the time frame for the Truth and Dignity Commission. It is 1955, not 1954.
    
Because of an editing error, an earlier version of this article misstated the start of the time frame for the Truth and Dignity Commission. It is 1955, not 1954.

 


 
 Articles
Articles
 
 
 
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire